UArizona Researcher Focuses on COVID-19 Rinse and Gargle Test

At the University of Arizona, two types of tests are typically offered to students and employees to detect the presence of COVID-19. Both the quick-turnaround antigen tests and the polymerase chain reaction test rely on a nasal swab to collect a sample. But for those who dread the stick up the nose, one UArizona researcher is hoping to add another tool to the university’s testing arsenal – one that relies instead on a simple saltwater rinse and gargle.

Michael Worobey, head of the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, specializes in the evolution of viruses. He began using the mouth rinse test in limited campus populations after reading a paper on the test published by researchers in British Columbia on medRxiv, a preprint server for health sciences research.

While papers published on preprint servers have not yet been peer reviewed and therefore should be treated as preliminary, Worobey deemed the report convincing enough to give the mouth rinse approach a shot. 

He has since used the test to collect samples from UArizona students in isolation dormitories who had already tested positive for COVID-19, as well as from students, staff and faculty willing to enroll in his study immediately after providing samples for clinical testing through Campus Health. The sampling effort aims to collect as many virus genomes as possible as part of an ongoing study that seeks to uncover how SARS-CoV-2 evolves over time and how it spreads through the human population. Initial results have been very encouraging, says Worobey, who also is associate director of the UArizona BIO5 Institute.

“It’s vastly more tolerable than the nasopharyngeal swab, and people can do it all by themselves and even keep their mask on almost the whole time,” says Worobey, who doesn’t know of any other U.S. universities using the mouth rinse test.

Demonstrating the procedure himself, Worobey cracks open a crayon-sized, pink plastic vial containing a liquid. “Off comes the top, you pull your mask down, and you just squirt a bit of sterile saltwater into your mouth.”

Worobey swishes the liquid around in his mouth for five seconds, then tilts his head back for 10 seconds of gargling. After a total of three cycles of swishing and gargling, Worobey spits the liquid into the specimen cup and screws the lid back on.

“And that’s it,” he says, “you’re done.”

Worobey says, based on his results, the mouth rinse test is more sensitive than a nasopharyngeal swab test. It also appears to be considerably more sensitive than a test based solely on saliva samples, where test subjects simply spit into a cup. The reason for the increased sensitivity, Worobey says, could be due to the fact that virus particles are pulled from the throat during the gargle phase in addition to the saliva collected during the mouth rinse procedure.

The saltwater gargle approach is also ideal for the extremely dry climate typical of fall in southern Arizona, which makes it difficult for some people to stay properly hydrated and produce the necessary amount of saliva needed for a spit test. 

“Our system allows the participants to painlessly collect virus from the back of their throat in a way that, so far, seems superior in terms of its ability to detect the virus,” Worobey said.

When Worobey tested the very first person in the study, using both the nasal swab and the saline gargle samples, the virus was detectable only in the gargle sample. Out of more than 100 people screened, he now has paired nasopharyngeal and saline gargle samples from 30 coronavirus-positive patients. In this head-to-head comparison, the oral rinse samples detected the virus in about 20% more patients than the nasopharyngeal ones.

“This shows that the salt rinse and gargle test can be more sensitive and catch an infection you’d miss with the nasopharyngeal test,” he says. “It also suggests that it’s doing a good job of detecting virus in people who have or recently had the virus.”

If success with the test continues, it could have the potential to transform how testing is done at the university.

Testing kit
The swish and gargle test is much more tolerable than the nasopharyngeal swab and eliminates the need for another person to administer the test, according to Michael Worobey.  Chris Richards/University of Arizona

“COVID-19 remains a significant public health threat, and testing has been a critical part of the University of Arizona’s test, trace and treat strategy to keep our students and employees as safe as possible,” said UArizona President Robert C. Robbins. “If this test proves to be as promising as early results indicate, it could eventually allow us to ramp up our already robust testing efforts in a really innovative way that allows us to administer high-quality and highly tolerable tests to large numbers of people.”

Deciphering the Viral Genome

Soon after the pandemic began, Worobey embarked on research that aimed to collect as many complete genome sequences of the coronavirus as possible, in a collaboration with David Harris, director of the UArizona Health Sciences Biorepository. Worobey also is one of three principal investigators for the Arizona COVID-19 Genomics Union, a joint effort between UArizona, Northern Arizona University and The Translational Research Genomics Institute that was set up to perform high-throughput sequencing of samples from COVID-19 patients to analyze the virus’s genomic sequences.

Accurately deciphering the viral genome, which consists of about 30,000 nucleotides – essentially the letters spelling out the genetic blueprint of all organisms – allows researchers and health officials to track different strains, track where each sample originated and where it may have been transmitted, and possibly reveal details that could provide critical information for diagnostics, antiviral drug targets, vaccine development and prevention of future pandemics.

“I think the saltwater gargle will work better than nasopharyngeal swabs,” Worobey said, “because for a research study, and eventually clinical testing, you need to get people to be OK with participating, and any kind of unpleasantness you throw at them means a lower percentage of people will participate.”

The mouth rinse is safer for health care workers, too, because test subjects can collect their own samples without the need for a health care worker to administer the test.

“For the medical technicians collecting nasopharyngeal swabs for diagnostic PCR tests, it just seems better to take the coughing, sneezing and close proximity out of the equation to reduce the risks to the brave people doing that vital work, yet still provide a highly sensitive test,” Worobey said.

To reconstruct complete genomes from samples containing coronavirus, researchers have to amplify the genetic material – in other words, make copies in the millions – and then stitch them together like pages randomly torn from a book.

Worldwide, more than 100,000 genomes have been sequenced so far, with most being deciphered with a technique pioneered by Worobey, whose team made headlines around the world when it successfully “resurrected” a complete genomic sequence from HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, from a decades-old tissue sample.

“It turns out sequencing many virus genomes works best if you amplify about 100 to 300 small sections of nucleotides, sequence them, then stitch them back together into a cohesive genomic sequence,” Worobey said. “We call it RNA jackhammering, because you tackle a big problem by applying a whole bunch of little blows to it.”

Worobey hopes that the saltwater gargle test lives up to expectations and might eventually be used not just for research purposes but also for public health and individualized clinical diagnostic testing on the University of Arizona campus and beyond. He thinks the test could fairly easily be scaled up to collect and process hundreds or thousands of samples per day – something that is more difficult to accomplish with standard saliva test samples, which are more viscous and therefore can be difficult to process.

Even if it doesn’t end up replacing currently used methods, Worobey says it could be another valuable tool. And, he adds, it is particularly user-friendly for school-aged children.

“That is an application where I could really see huge benefit to a safe, inexpensive – but most importantly less invasive – sampling modality like this,” he said.


Worobey encourages anyone who has been diagnosed with COVID-19 within the past week to consider enrolling in his research study by sending an email to sends e-mail).

For the latest on the University of Arizona response to the novel coronavirus, visit the university’s COVID-19 webpage

For UANews coverage of COVID-19, visit

Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button